Whether man die in his bed
Or the rifle knocks him dead,
A brief parting from those dear
Is the worst man has to fear.
Though grave-digger’s toil is long,
Sharp their spades, their muscles strong,
They but thrust their buried men
Back in the human mind again.
(W.B. Yeats, Under Ben Bulben)
While I’m fascinated by the Bolivian terrorism story, it’s a little off my beat — there’s more than enough weirdness and kinky violence right here in Mexico. Otto and Bina are doing a better job (and sometimes scooping the big boys) of keeping up with the Bolivian-Croatian-Hungarian-Argentine-Colombian conundrum, and the best I can do is take a look now and again at the Irish Times.. or pass those interested on to them.
Conor Lally, the Times crime correspondent, has been doing an excellent job of following up on Michael Dwyer, the Irish “tourrorist” that seems to be a side issue in all this. There are some eyebrow raising suggestions in Lally’s story (the Irish security company where the dead man worked has an unsavory reputation, but no website; who were the other 17 Irish travelers, and what was this “training course” he told his parents he was taking in Bolivia.
But, what really caught my attention in Lally’s article was this from Martin Dwyer, the dead man’s father:
Mr Dwyer said he was disgusted that pictures of his son’s body appeared in newspapers after his death.
While perhaps, out of shame, or grief, the Dwyers wish to retreat into privacy, privacy is not extended to the dead in Latin America. The dead have no shame, nor is it any assault on dignidad – dignity being the ultimate right of personhood in this part of the world — to be exposed in death.
It seems grusome to outsiders – and there’s no getting around the fact that it takes an adjustment — that death, even violent death, is an accepted fact of life. Whether traffic accident victims, headless gangsters (or their victims), suicides or foreign terrorists gunned down in a hotel room, the photos are going to be published. The same as those who die a “natural” death are not prettified, nor is there any indignity.
Visitors get a ghoulish thrill from Latin America’s acceptance of the “not pretty.” The spate of media reports on Mexico’s Santa Muerte focus on the sect as a “Death Cult”. It’s not. It’s a religion that accepts death, but so does Christianity. In our churches, the image of Jesus is not some nice, cleaned up corpse ready for the “viewing”. Jesus’ limbs are distended from the crucifixion, the lance wound in the side, and the crown of thorns are bloody. The mystery at the heart of Christianity is resurrection, but to have resurrection, one must accept that Jesus died under torture, and to turn one’s gaze from the torture is to deny the significance of the resurrection.
It is not that one likes the images, nor that one accepts gangsterism, or terrorism… or auto accidents for that matter. But they are not abstractions, something alien to one’s life. This does not make Latin Americans fatalistic… the survivors of those whose bloody demise is splashed across the morning papers mourn their loved ones just as an Irish family does. But they — and we — understand quite well that this is part of being human.
There are those who say images of violence make one tolerant of violence. No, it’s the abstraction of violence. Real violence is not shown: the same country that would not publish even photographs of coffins of dead soldiers from an extremely violent invasion is the same country where an entire industy is built on violence as entertainment. Hollywood movies are extremely violent, and popular television series in the United States, “CSI” , is premised on the idea that violent death is an interesting intellectual puzzle.
Northerners, with a few exceptions, have never cottoned on to the Latin American sense that death is a fact of life. One of the few was the naturalized Mexican writer, Bruno Traven. Traven’s 1929 novel, Die Brücke im Dschungel (The Bridge in the Jungle in English, El puente en la selva in Spanish) is essential to understanding the Mexican way of death… and, in some ways, the Latin American (and human) way. A little boy is killed, ironically, by the “gifts of civilization” (unaccustomed to wearing shoes, he falls off a bridge and drowns) and the unnamed narrator becomes a partipant in the lengthy funeral rites. There is nothing pretty about the dissolution of a corpse in the jungle heat, but there is nothing unnatural about it, nor any attempt by Traven or his characters to deny it. It is in the nature of thing… and humans… to die and to rot.
It is in the nature of foreigners with guns to be shot and to leave a bloody corpse. In Mexico, one admits to mortality. Tourists come for the oddity of Dia de los Muertos, but there is nothing ghoulish about celebrating life and death. Levity is part of being human too, and the irreverence shown to death itself is in no way showing irreverence to the dead. It’s death that is not to be feared, but mocked. Not the dead themselves. They, no matter the cause — gunshot or a noose — maintain their dignidad.
The English always were a “nation of shopkeepers”. Eddie — who is not shown at left –may be a grumpy conservative Englishman (is there any other kind?), but…
It’s a fairly “new” city (the Cathedral was financed by that great sinner,
I had to spend about 10 hours once in Tampico waiting for an overnight bus to Houston, and really was just too tired that trip to do any exploring. I rented what was allegedly a hotel room, but was treated quite well… given the “Vicente Fox suite”… which had, besides the basics I required (an unoccupied bed and a toilet) a plush velour high-backed arm chair in the middle of a room painted with what I assume was leftover boat paint (”portugese pink” — a mix of battleship gray, industrial green and rust-inhibiting red) and scratched with the names and dates (and various endowments) of previous tenants. The neighbors were quite considerate… or else I was very tired … keeping the moans to a quiet murmer.




























