The Mex Files

Entries categorized as ‘Oaxaca’

Delivery girl

11 November 2009 · Leave a Comment

A lot of people, myself included, had our first job as teenagers making deliveries.  Bertha Martinez Sebastian is one of them… but her deliveries are a little more complicated than the morning newspaper:

(Ricardo Ibara, EFE, via Latin American Herald Tribune [Caracas])

Bertha Martinez Sebastian, 16, combines going to school with her work as a traditional midwife in an isolated village in the southeastern Mexican state of Oaxaca, where she has assisted at more than 40 births.

A Mixe Indian, Bertha Martinez told Efe in an interview that her career as a midwife began at the age of 14 in her native town of Santa Maria Alotepec, which is four hours by road from the nearest public hospital.

… [S]he acquired the necessary skills through organizations that promote natural methods such as Nueve Lunas, which has a training program for midwives called “Luna Llena” (Full Moon).

Bertha is a member of Mexico’s Sexual and Reproductive Rights Network, and since becoming a midwife has also attended international conferences and training courses in the neighboring states of Morelos and Chiapas.

Bertha combines her work as a midwife with high school studies and plans to continue until she becomes a professional doctor, though her immediate goal is to study natural medicine and the complete functions of the human body.

Up to now, one of her priorities has been to use and promote medicinal plants as a means of healing the sick.

“I like to say that it’s always better with medicinal plants because they don’t contain all those chemical compounds, they’re something natural that our ancestors knew about and they’re an inheritance we ought to make use of,” she said.

Bertha’s house is also her office. There she gives advice and administers treatments to those who come because they are pregnant or for some ailment.

She also makes house calls for her patients, since a pregnant woman in an Indian settlement prefers to give birth at home surrounded by her family.

I wonder if she also does baby-sitting?  Probably not on school nights.

Categories: Children · Education and educators · Health · La Raza (Mexican cultures and peoples) · Medicine · Mixtec · Oaxaca · Real Mexico · Teenagers · Women

Human rights — slightly better

16 October 2009 · Leave a Comment

[P]rove one case, one single case in which the authorities have not acted, in which human rights have been violated, in which the relevant authorities haven’t responded to punish those who have abused their legal powers: whether they are police, soldiers, or any other authority.

Felipe Calderón

Where to start? Amnesty International, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and The Committee To Protect Journalists have all weighed in at various times… but have been dismissed as foreign meddling. Now, the Supreme Court of Justice has responded — taking the unusual step of not only ruling on a “single case in which the authorities have not acted, in which human rights have been violated,” but also informing probable or potential human rights abusers what exactly they are doing wrong.

Last Wednesday (14 October), the ministers issued a finding that specifically named Oaxaca Governor Ulises Ruiz as the authority that violated human rights during the 2006 teachers’ protests that escalated into full scale rebellion.  Three ministers (Juan N. Silva Meza, José de Jesús Gudiño Pelayo y José Ramón Cossío) issued what in the U.S. system would be a concurrent opinion, naming Vicente Fox, then Secretary of Public Security Eduardo Molina Mora and then Secretaría de Gobernacíon, the late Carlos Abascal, as equally responsible.

In addition, two police officials were also named in the report as culpable for criminal violations.

The Supreme Court of Justice cannot order prosecutions, and for political reasons it is unlikely that Ruiz will face charges (both the State and Federal legislatures are controlled by the PRI, Ruiz’ own party, which is loathe to open up a can of worms, and Ruiz’ support was crucial in electing [if he was elected] Felipe Calderón to the Presidency).  Ruiz’ term expires in December 2010, with elections scheduled for next July.  The most likely immediate result is a united front to break the PRI hold on state government.  The last attempt, which included only the left failed — depending on who you chose to believe — because of election fraud on the part of PRI, because the PRI was able to take advantage of the large Zapatista constituency within the state (the Zapatistas rejecting electoral politics) and the failure to bring PAN into the equation.  The Zapatistas are going to do their own thing, no matter what, and with the National PAN now seeing the PRI as a bigger threat to hanging on to the Presidency than the PRD-led coalition it faced in 2006, a united opposition is a viable, and probable, option.

The unusual step taken by the Supreme Court in sending their findings to all State governors, puts them on notice that “any authority” — at least at the state level — who violates human rights is fair game for ambitious public ministers.  A couple obvious candidates for scrutiny — Enrique Peña Nieto (the odds-on favorite for PRI Presidential candidate in 2010) for state action during the Atenco situation and former Jalisco Governor, Francisco Ramírez Acuña (a hard-right PANista, who served as Calderón’s first Sec. de Gobernacion) for having anti-globalization protesters arrested and tortured during a May 2004 summit meeting).  Mario Marín Torres, the “gober preciosa” accused of  having Lydia Cacho kidnapped, jailed and raped for uncovering his connection to an international kiddy-porn ring, may not be off the hook, although an earlier court ruling said he was not personally liable for the particular incident involving Cacho’s phony arrest.

Undoing all “impunity”, especially that enjoyed by federal officials is going to take a little more time.  At least the President can no longer blithely dismiss claims of abuse.  Just the admission that attention must be paid to human rights is a huge step forward.

Categories: 2006 Elections · Courts · Crime and Punishment · FAP (PRD-PT-Convergencia) · Felipe Calderón · Human Rights · Jalisco · Legal system · Mexico (Estado de) · Oaxaca · Oaxaca en luche (2006) · PAN · Politica (Mexicana) · Provincia · Puebla · Ulises Ruiz Ortiz

Today we have to correct those things that don’t work in the country

12 October 2009 · Leave a Comment

(One update at end)

or so said Don Felipe, justifying the dissolution of Luz y Fuero de Centro, the Mexico City metropolitan electric company (the rest of the country is served by CFE, Comisión Federal de Electricidad.

While I’m waiting for the snarky responses from those that are going to list other government entities that “don’t work in the country”, I was struck by Calderón’s calling attention to the amount of money lost by LyFC compared to other government programs… which would indicate a management, not a labor problem.

respeto

If I heard right, the workers — whom, if we take Calderón at his word, are losing their jobs because of poor management — are going to receive assistance finding jobs with “small enterprises”.  How that jives with his statement that there were no plans to privatize the national power company makes me wonder if he doesn’t, as the union claim, simply want to break contracts, and destroy the union movement… something his party has always stood for (and, until recently, the other parties wouldn’t).

Electrical workers' protest (photo: El Universal)

Electrical workers' protest (photo: David Jamarillo, El Universal)

While privatization may be technically off the table, I wouldn’t be surprised to see introduction of a PEMEX type “reform” that allows for outside contractors to bid on subsidiary services, and which will pit the laid off 15,000 union workers who took to the streets in protest Sunday.

At the same time, there are legal questions.  For starters, a union contract with one employer is still valid when another owner takes over the business… in this case, when CFE takes over LyFC.  Sindicato Mexicano de Electricistas (SME) is not going down without a fight, with other unions and several political leaders (notably AMLO) arguing the Calderón Administration’s end game is the destruction of the independent union movement… something well in line with both PAN’s more recent “neo-liberal” policies that assume a public utility should turn a profit (something alien to political traditions that hold the utilities to be a public service, not a business) and its historic roots in anti-labor movements (including fascism).

16-luzx

Photo: Alberto Lopez, El Universal

Ironically, CFE is raising its electrical rates, which have led to protests by business groups, manufacturers, consumers and tourist operations throughout the country. Protests, like this one by Tehuana women, are becoming more common.

Laura Carlsen, as usual, provides excellent background and overview:

The decree follows a union conflict that the government fueled and then took advantage of to eliminate the company and its union. The union elections last June were contested by the losing group amid rumors that the federal government was actively fomenting division. In a warning sign, on Oct. 5 the Secretary of Labor, Javier Lozano, rejected registration of the new union leadership without waiting for a decision from the Labor Tribunal…

…The Mexican Electrical Workers Union (SME, by its Spanish initials) is among the most active and independent unions in a country that has been dominated by government-affiliated unions. Its membership has led the many battles for defense of labor rights and standard of living in the country. SME leader, Martin Esparza, declared the Calderon takeover “unconstitutional” and has vowed to fight against the liquidation of the company and of the union contract. In a joint interview on MSVRadio, he spoke alongside the defeated union candidate, Alejandro Munoz, in which both declared common cause to fight against the administration’s union-busting move.

Categories: AMLO · Economy & Business · Felipe Calderón · Human Rights · Manifestaciones · Oaxaca · Organized Labor (Sindicatos) · PAN · Politica (Mexicana) · Provincia · Real Mexico

What he said

10 August 2009 · Leave a Comment

Being Presidente Legitimo means never having to say you’re sorry, but it does mean that — unlike United States Congressional Representatives — when you’re out doing the August meet the people thing, the intimidation level is a lot more than just shouting and subtle threats of violence.  Lopez Obrador is meeting with the 418 Mixtec communes in Oaxaca which are governed by “uso y costumbre”.

In Santa María Tepalcatepec local state police commander Andrés Melchor Hernández sent out a dozen officers armed with high caliber weapons to “convince” locals not to attend the speech.  Lopez Obrador gave it anyway.  He pretty much said what he wrote to Messers. Calderon, Obama and Harper this weekend:

Respectable leaders:

There is still time to correct the defects in the origin of the North America Free Trade Agreement; a model that was designed to benefit large corporations rather than people.

Without a doubt, the fifteen years of this treaty have seen the worst this country has suffered.  Throughout this period there has been virtually no economic growth, no support for producers, the manufacturing sector has lost 15 percent of the jobs that were available before 1994, we import more than half the food we eat, and have become a major exporter of laborers.

In large measure, due to the absurd policies imposed during the fifteen years of NAFTA, six million Mexicans have been forced to emigrate, risking everything, to suffer from discrimination and violation of their human rights, to find something to quench their hunger and their poverty.

Despite this, the governments of the three countries have not undertaken any agreements to build a more efficient, equitable, fair and mutually beneficial relationship. By contrast, in 2005, they supported the Alliance for Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), which presupposes that cooperative military actions are the means to foster development.

It is incredible that in addressing the migration issue and the problems of insecurity and violence, you consider only coercive measures, without understanding that these problems are rooted the lack of economic growth, unemployment and the welfare crisis in our country.

Hence, we respectfully urge you review reconsider the terms of our relationship in terms of cooperative development, which will improve the working and living conditions of our peoples, and recognize that security and peace are the fruits of justice.

Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador

Whether I agree with Lopez Obrador or not is beside the point.  He articulates a common sentiment about NAFTA that is widely held in Mexico.  Statistically, he received as much of the vote in the last presidential election as Felipe Calderon, and he has by no means gone away.  Even if he is not a candidate for office, or only a candidate for a minor party, his constituency — mostly rural and working class — will matter very much and are ignored by foreign commentators at their own peril.

Categories: Agriculture · Economy & Business · Emigrant labor/remittances · Mixtec · Multinationals · NAFTA · Oaxaca · Trade agreements and issues

Tradition… it’s a drag

26 November 2008 · 1 Comment

BY MICA ROSENBERG

Reuters

JUCHITAN, Oax. – Attaching flowers to a ribbon headdress, pulling a lace slip under an embroidered skirt and draping a necklace of gold coins over his head, Pedro Martínez puts the finishing touches on the traditional costume of Zapotec women in southern Mexico.

“When I get all dressed up like this my father always says, ‘Oh Pedro! You look just like your mother when she was young,’ ” beams Martínez, 28, gluing on fake eyelashes in front of a mirror.

Martínez spent two hours in the hair salon he owns getting ready for this past weekend’s festival of the “muxes,” indigenous gays and transvestites in the town of Juchitán who have found a haven of acceptance in Mexico’s macho society.

The muxes (pronounced moo-shes), mostly of ethnic Zapotec descent, are widely respected in the southern town where a dance and parade that crowns a transvestite queen and celebrates the harvest has been held annually for the last 33 years.

Anthropologists say the tradition of blurring genders among Mexico’s indigenous population is centuries old but has been revived in recent decades due to the gay pride movement.

RAUCOUS PARTY

Several dozen muxes were blessed by a Catholic priest at a Mass before joining visiting transvestites and other townsfolk at a raucous party on Saturday night. The muxes wore either traditional local costumes or ball gowns and high heels.

The beer-fueled fiesta continued into Sunday at a parade through town.

Some of the muxes, a Zapotec word derived from the Spanish for woman, or “mujer,” dress as women year round and others are gays who only don women’s clothes at the annual party, or not at all.

The area around Juchitán, a laid-back town near the Pacific, has a history of women playing leading roles in public life.

“The legend here is that mothers pray for a gay son who can take care of them when they are old,” theater director Sergio Santamaría, 56, said over a traditional breakfast of iguana soup and sweet corn tamales.

DUAL-GENDERED GODS

Native people in the Americas with ambiguous gender were often regarded as wise and talented, said Rosemary Joyce, a professor of anthropology at the University of California at Berkeley.

“They were seen as having a kind of spiritual power that comes from being more like the ancestors who are mothers and fathers at once, and more like the divinities who may be dual gendered,” Joyce said.

Anthropologists have found evidence of mixed gender identities across Mesoamerica, from Mayan corn and moon gods that are both male and female and Aztec priests who ritually cross dressed.

The Spanish Conquest in the 16th century and the Catholic Church snuffed out much of that tolerance.

“The colonizing power was very rigid about sex. They came in and rapidly suppressed all these practices, which doesn’t mean they went away. It means they went underground,” Joyce said.

While homosexuality has long been accepted in Juchitán, it is only recently that muxes feel secure enough to cross-dress and they have taken on causes like AIDS education, since the region has one of the highest HIV rates in the state of Oaxaca.

“There have always been muxes, but before they would wear just a dress shirt with a feminine touch, like gold buttons. The transvestites are the new generation,” said Santamaría.

Categories: Gays · La Raza (Mexican cultures and peoples) · Oaxaca · Provincia · Real Mexico · Tourism · Travestis · Zapotecs

The Bird Man of Mazatlán

3 November 2008 · 3 Comments

Whether Andrew Jackson Grayson should be included among the great artists who were only recognized posthumously, or as a 19th century scientist and explorer is hard to say.  Whether being expected to work on a history of Mazatlán is a sign of faith in Gods, Gachupines and Gringos… or more proof that no good deed goes unpunished, I’ll leave to you.

But Grayson is a fascinating — and largely unknown — 19th century personage.  Was it a tragedy that an artist had to toil in a shop, or was toiling in a shop what made him the artistic and scientific genius that he was?

This is a draft for the Mazatlán book.  The original material is based on my translations from Oses Cole, Diccionario biográfico e histórico de Mazatlán (Mazatlán, Sinaloa:Cruz Roja Mexica, 2006) and information from Beyond Audubon: Andrew Jackson Grayson, Louisiana’s Forgotten Artist (Louisiana State Archives). The photo is from the Lousiana State website.  Artwork from Andrew Jackson Grayson: Birds of the Pacific Slope (San Francisco: Arion Press, 1986).

Born in 1818 in Lousiana, the son of a prosperous plantation owner, Andrew Jackson Grayson had always wanted to draw. One glimpse of Audubon’s Birds of the United States was enough to set Grayson on his life’s mission – bird painting – and his frustrating, tragic career as a scientist and artist, whose importance is only now being recognized.

Already a recognized bird expert by the early 1840s, Grayson was hired as a field collector by the new Smithsonian Institution. This didn’t put food on the table, and Grayson, with his wife Francis and infant son, Edward, emigrated to California in 1846. In a career marked by bad luck and worse timing, whatever it was that forced the Graysons to drop out of their wagon train along the way was probably for the best. The Donner Party went on without the Graysons.


Financially, Grayson did extremely well out of the California gold rush, as a San Francisco retail grocer and real estate speculator. In some ways, he welcomed the end of the gold rush, which allowed him to move to rural San Jose, where he built “Bird Nest Cottage,” worked on his artistic technique and become more than an amateur painter.


There, as the anonymous author of the Louisiana State Archives biography says:


He developed his own painting style and soon became a very competent artist.

His technique involved an initial sketch of the outline of a bird and the form of the background landscape and vegetation. The bird was then painted in minute detail in light pencil strokes then developed with washes in pale tones. He then progressed to filling in the detail of the background. He finished using a dry brush technique working in strong, clean colors.

In part because of the Donner Party experience, travel between California and the settled eastern half of the United States in the 1850s was normally done by sailing down the Pacific Coast to Salina Cruz, Oaxaca, crossing the Isthumus of Tehuantepec to what was then Puerto Mexico (today’s Coatzacoalcos) or Veracruz, and then sailing to New Orleans. On a business trip, combined with his part-time work for the Smithsonian, Grayson made the first of the paintings later included in his masterwork, Birds of the Pacific Slope, while travelling across the Isthumus in 1857. Although recognized as both an artist and a scientific writer, he was unable to completely support his family on by these activities, and finding the San Francisco retail trade not as lucrative as it had been during the early gold rush, Grayson moved his family – and opened a new store – in the then booming port of Mazatlán in 1859.


While his store never prospered, his artistic career matured during his time in Mazatlan. In his major works, Grayson’s technical skill exhibits a surprising ability to achieve dynamic compositions with brillliant color and exotic details.

(more…)

Categories: Andrew Jackson Grayson · Animals · Artists, Writers, Philosophers, etc. · Birds · Emperor Maximiliano · Environment · Gringo(landia) · John James Audubon · Mazatlan · Mexican History 1824-1910 · Nayarit · New Orleans · Non-Mexican writers/artists on Mexico · Oaxaca · Provincia · Science · Sinaloa · Tabasco (Estado de) · Veracruz · Writers, artists, philosphers outside Mexico

Fight for the right to party!

21 July 2008 · 1 Comment

(Dissident teachers at the start of the Alternative Guelaguetza,in Oaxaca. Notimex photo by Hugo Alberto Velasco, printed in The News)

It’s that time again.  The annual running of the protesters in Oaxaca always cumulates in the now traditional duelling traditional Guelaguetzas.  What had been since the 17th century a religious fiesta and market was always running away from the authorities, as the locals had their own ideas of what they expected from the Oaxaca-wide swap meet and party.  In the early 1930s, to satisfy the people’s needs, and at the same time satisfy restrictions on religious processions in public,  Guelaguetza was given a new identity as a “folk festival.”  That was fine until the State, in the 1980s and 90s decided to make the event a tourist attraction.  While the State invested in facilities and brought in “acts” to perform for the tourists.  The chronic political and social unrest within the State, as tourism and other foreign investments (especially in mining) left people feeling more and more alienated from the State government, cumulated in violent uprising in 2006.

One “victim” of the violence was the offical Guelaguetza — dissidents burned down the “traditional” site (in use since the 1930s).  Since “the show must go on” (and the last thing anyone wanted were tour groups cancelling their reservations), the Guelaguetza went on in a heavily guarded compound, while an ad hoc alternative Guelaguetza took place in the streets, sponsored by the dissident unions and other groups.

This year’s events are being held both at the official site (Cerro Fortin) and at the State University Stadium.  The problem in Oaxaca, according to some, was that the state was run by a single political party.  Maybe this doesn’t change the politics, but it’s a step in the right direction to set up a “two party” system.

Categories: Economy & Business · Folklore/customs · Guelaguetza · Human Rights · La Raza (Mexican cultures and peoples) · Mining · Oaxaca · Oaxaca en luche (2006) · Politica (Mexicana) · Provincia · Real Mexico · Tourism

Used wife, one owner…

2 July 2008 · 1 Comment

I still do not “get” the people who defend “usos y costumbres” as a progressive cause (I’ve had run-ins with the Oaxaca Studies Action Group people over this — the upshot being I subscribe to that yahoo group any more, and I seriously question the journalistic integrity of Narco News Bulletin, which was printing reports by some of these people without fact-checking).  As best I can understand, the traditionalists were among the many who opposed (and still oppose) the Ulises Ruiz administration, and the PRI political machine.  Some on the progressive side seem to think voting by consensus (as opposed to a “free and secret ballot” in the words of the Mexican Constitution) among communities that reject PRI is “good” … and that among those who back the PRI is the result of manipulation.

Setting aside individual rights within traditional communities was probably the worst thing the Fox administration did. I know there are those who defend the constititional change (a capitulation to the Zapatistas — which for some odd reason enjoys wide support from the left) on the grounds that it preserves native culture, but as a human rights issue, I’m not sure it should be supported by these progressives.  Most of them would scream bloody murder if they had to live in small towns run by “traditional family values” rules.

People either have rights just as people, or they don’t.  I don’t see how a modern state, and our modern concept of individual rights can coexist with these “traditional values”… and seriously doubt that preserving them is worthwhile.

My translation is from a 24 June 2008 article in Milenio by Blanca Valadez

Follwing the uses and indigenous customs of the pueblo of Santa María Asunción, Huautla de Jiménez, Oaxaca, Guadalupe was sold by her family on two different occasions, .The first time, as a 17 year old, she sold for seven thousand pesos. The second, having been forced to return home when he husband no longer wanted her, her parents sold her for 3,500 pesos, “slighly used.”

She had been married for six years to the first husband. Her son was left behind. A few days later she was “acquired” by Manuel, who refused to pay the full price to his in-laws, alleging his purchase had been mislabeled as a virgin.

Manuel’s in-laws complained about the non-payment, and a few months later filed a legal demand befor the municipal agency for payment of the 3,500 pesos.

Municipal authorities would not stop the sale. On the contrary, they obliged Manuel to pay up immediately, or risk being sent to jail. The court procedings in this community are in the first langague, Mazateco.

“In Santa María Asunción when a man sees a woman who doesn’t have a boyfriend, he doesn’t try to get to know her, but buys her. He goes to her parents and asks “what do you want for her, and what can I afford?’.”

“In many families, they also require you to feed the family on the wedding day, but not everyone adds that condition,” said Yolanda Bartolo Cortés; whose mother, Cecilia Cortés, was sold by her father over 20 years ago.

Yolanda said that some men have tried to avoid paying for women, as did Ramiro Bartolo Cortés, who refused to pay the 5,000 pesos demanded for Eva, with whom he now lives in Mexico City.
However, under pressure from his in-laws, who tracked them down to their home in colonia Santa Domingo in delegación Coyoacán, he had been obligated to pay at least 3000 pesos.

Now Ramiro wants to send Eva back home, and to live with Maria, a teenager from that same Oaxaca town he met when Eva went back to Santa María Asunción to have their first child.

“Even though Maria’s parents knew Eva was my pregnant sister-in-law and Ramiro was her husband, they offered to sell him their daughter for ten thousand pesos. The only reason he didn’t buy her is that he didn’t have the money. In fact, he’s not working, and his wife is supporting him,” Yolanda Bartolo Cortés related.

“My brother told Eva, “Get lost. I don’t want you any more. I want the other girl,” but my sister-in-law stayed, even though he beats her, not caring that he is pregnant.”
Although the sale of women is practically a custom in that community, not everyone accepts their destiny, and some try to flee.

Cecilia Cortés is 39 years old. At 14 she was sold to Hipólito Bartolo, a year older. “My mother tried to flee when she found out the negotiation. One of her uncles found her down by the river, and dragged her back by her hair.

“There was no way out. To leave, she’d need a boat to get out of that palce, since thee wasn’t any bridge. And my mother had no money or help. There was no other option for her, but to marry my father both in church and in a legal wedding, and to spend years in a living hell.”

Lupita, Eva and Cecilia not only have in common being sold by their families, but being the victims of abuse and family violence as well.

Yolanda saw her alcoholic father knock her mother to the ground several times, as was she several times when she tried to defend her mother.

There is hope for legislative change.

A government agency, Inmujeres – the Women’s Institute — has denounced the mainly poor and indigenous communities of Oaxaca, Chiapas, Campeche and Guerrero, that by use and custom allow women to be sold, often for as little as two cases of soda pop and one case of beer.
A study by Inmujeres finds that in these states the criminal penalities for cattle theft are more severe than for attempting to sell a woman, sexual abuse, holding a woman against her will, or holding her peonage.

Liliana Rojero Luévano, the Executive Secretary of Inmujeres, says the institute is working with the individual legislators in the state congresses to modify the penal codes and civil procedures in these matters.

“In places like Campeche, a man usually is absolved of rape charges if the woman lives in the same house. The same result happens in child abuse cases, if he is able to manipulate the child’s testimony.”

In Oaxaca, for example, there has been in increase in the number of women murdered by their husbands, family, or other men have been increasing, and the legal sanctions are missing.
In the last several months more than 30 women have been murdered, leading to to formation of a commission to recommend a series of changes.

In Oaxaca, women who have attempted to change their situation, or spoken out on the matter have been murdered, as were communal radio journalists Teresa Baptist Merino and Felícitas Martinez Sanchez.

There have also been intimidation in these communities against women like Eufrosina Cruz, whose election first as municipal president and then edil of Santa María Quiegolani were nullified despite votes in her favor.

“If the states do not modify their penal and civil laws, they will not receive a single one of the seven million pesos earmarked for anti-violence programs. In San Luis Potosí major modifications in the law that protect women have been implemented, and, what is important, they were done without targeting any communal uses and customs,” Rojero Luévano said.

Categories: Campeche · Chiapas · Clueless gringos in Mexico · Crime and Punishment · Folklore/customs · Guerrero (State) · Human Rights · Indigenous People(s) · Informal economy · La Raza (Mexican cultures and peoples) · Legal system · Mazatecos · Oaxaca · PRI · Provincia · Real Mexico · Ulises Ruiz Ortiz · Zapatistas

Oaxaca… “Totally partial” — say what?

15 June 2008 · 1 Comment

I know some people assume the source (Al Jazeera) would be de facto unreliable, but I’m not sure why a news organization owned by Arab oil money would be any more biased than one owned by any other corporatation.  Besides, not having a dog in this hunt, I can’t see why they’d want to spin anything.  Anyway… the U.S. press seems to have forgotten about Oaxaca, even though protests still go on.

Tens of thousands of protesters have converged on the southern city of Oaxaca in Mexico to protest against the regional government.

The protests on Saturday also mark the second anniversary of a violent crackdown on a teachers’ protest, that left more than two dozens dead.

Florentino Lopex Martinez, a protester, said: “This is a policy of oppression, the most fascist type of oppression in the whole of Oaxaca’s history. The methods of repression have worsened considerably.”

In 2006, protesting teachers had siezed the main plaza demanding better working conditions.

They complained that Ortiz was corrupt and came to office through a stolen election.

The protest developed into a broad demonstration against social and economic conditions in the poor Mexican state.

Violent crackdown

State and federal police violently cracked down on the protest leaving at least 27 people dead.

Witnesses claim gunmen supporting the governor fired into a crowd. There have been no convictions for the killings as yet.

His opponents say Ortiz uses violence to suppress his political opponents.

Amnesty International has said that his administration has been behind the murders of dozens of opposition members.

National and international human rights organisations say most of the violence now takes place in remote villages of Oaxaca.

Talking to Al Jazeera, Ortiz said: “There is no documentation to implicate any government official. Amnesty International’s report is totally partial.”

Ortiz’s Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has ruled Oaxaca for nearly 80 consecutive years.

Categories: Human Rights · Manifestaciones · Oaxaca · Oaxaca en luche (2006) · PRI · Politica (Mexicana) · Provincia · Ulises Ruiz Ortiz

Oaxaca– here we go again…

25 May 2008 · 4 Comments

I haven’t checked in with Jennifer Rogers in a while.  When it comes to Oaxaca, and to Mexican traditional agriculture, she’s da (wo)man.  Apparently not being physically in Oaxaca right now is a challenge she’s been able to work around.

Strike in Zocalo Oaxaca:

I wish I was there to give you my own firsthand account. But, for now, here is a post from libcom.org.

Oaxaca in revolt again: the Zócalo reoccupied, motorway tollbooths “liberated”, roads blockaded
May 22nd, 2008 by Alan
A 21 day series of strikes and occupations by the radical Sección 22 in Oaxaca of the Mexican teachers’ union Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores en la Educación kicked off in earnest on Tuesday. As of Thursday, the strike appears to be spreading – with popular support, solidarity and an increasing volume of activity.<!–

The teachers’ strike has various demands, although it’s mostly calling for the freedom for all political prisoners, an end to the arrest orders and ongoing intimidation by the judicial authorities against the movement, new elections within the SNTE, and the handing over of all Oaxacan schools controlled by the pro-government Sección 59.

Tortilla Inflation:

From a blog at the Wall Street Journal:

More Tortilla Inflation?

Annelena Lobb has this report on how rising corn costs continue to affect Mexico.

As the price of food staples continues to rise around the world, some in Mexico are worrying about another flare-up of the tortilla wars.

corn_art_200_20080516133511.jpg

Corn prices, which impact the price of tortillas, have been rising.

Earlier this week, a tortilla industry group warned of looming price increases for the maize tortilla. The rising price of corn worldwide has fueled inflation in Mexico, causing the central bank to maintain high interest rates in an effort to head off a wage-price spiral in other goods and services.

Categories: Agriculture · Banking · Economy & Business · Education and educators · Food and Drink · Human Rights · Oaxaca · Oaxaca en luche (2006) · Organized Labor (Sindicatos) · Provincia

TV worth watching

10 April 2008 · 1 Comment

You probably won’t find this on U.S. television, nor on the Mexican stations (well, maybe Canal Onze), but worth watching is French journalist Marie-Monique Robin’s two-hour probe of Montsanto — “The World According to Montsanto” — produced for the Franco-German ARTES network.

After reviewing the history of the chemical giant turned bio-tech company — and essential agricultural supplier — the program begins looking at the effects of bio-engineering on crops at after the first hour.  At about an hour and twenty minutes, attention is focused on the problems GM corn has caused in Oaxaca, and the fight by local producers to protect native strains.

The program file is too huge to post here directly.  BSAlert has The World According to Montsanto (in English) on a “Google Video”.

Categories: Agriculture · Economy & Business · Environment · Food and Drink · Health · Multinationals · Oaxaca · Provincia · Technology · World (outside the Americas)

When you’re a Jet, you’re a Jet…

20 March 2008 · 8 Comments

When I first wrote this on Sunday, for posting on Thursday afternoon, I depended on “mainstream media” coverage, which made me think this was just a difference of opinion over style. As of Wednesday night (19 March) it was being reported as such in the only U.S. coverage I’ve seen… from Idolator. I still don’t understand what’s going on, but, after looking at alternative sources — anti-emo websites, sports papers and the gay press, this appears to be a more serious incident than I realized. As with all things Mexican, the truth is never pure and seldom simple. Anyone with better information is welcome to comment. I’ll try to revise this before it posts on Thursday, but between my moving, and trying to make sense of what’s going on, this may be posted unfinished. I’ll just keep working on it, and let it automatically post on Thursday…

Los Emos tangled with los Punketos last week… and after punches were thrown, los Granaderos were called out to keep the two warring parties … joined by los Metalicos and los Goths … apart (at la Angel). Los Krishnas appeared on the scene to serenade all factions.

WTF???? I have enough trouble telling one faction from another within the PRD to try fathoming the nuances of Mexico City’s “tribus urban” … youth groups (“gang” is probably too loaded a word).

Los punketos, as their name suggests, take their cues from the punk rock movement. I thought Punk died along with Sid Vicious, but in Mexico older styles sometimes last well beyond their expiration date. Los Krishnas I can’t figure out… maybe second generation Dead Heads?

The rumble with los emos –short for “emotional” (their style seems more that of los Goths –who despite their attempts to look like Aztec vampires were kinda sweet, harmless folks). An e-mail from Queretero describes them as “the kids who dress in Abercrombie and Fitch knockoffs and wear a lot of hair gel.” In other words, about half of all Mexican teenagers. The “Urban Dictionary” is a bit snarkier, defining “emo” as a:

Genre of softcore punk music that integrates unenthusiastic melodramatic 17 year olds who dont smile, high pitched overwrought lyrics and inaudible guitar rifts with tight wool sweaters, tighter jeans, itchy scarfs (even in the summer), ripped chucks with favorite bands signature, black square rimmed glasses, and ebony greasy unwashed hair that is required to cover at least 3/5 ths of the face at an angle.

The problem, according to one punketo, is that the”emos” are guilty of “cultural theft” from the punketos. , El Universal’s report suggested that’s all there was to the fracas — kids staking out not so much a “turf” on the landscape as a style and sensibility.

There are some key differences: going by dueling youtube videos, the emos wear their hair combed down over their foreheads, los punketos wear it sticking up. Oh, and los emos are gay friendly, or — to use a word that was a cliche five minutes after it was coined — “metrosexual”.

This is where the thing goes from being a semi-humorous fight over style to something with a sinister substance.

Sergay Scouting News says the attack was a well-organized “hunt” for emos … and gays. Scouting News also reports that los punketos were joined by a porro (basically a futbol fan club, but sometimes a gang of “rowdies-for-hire”, as with English football fan clubs) representing the UNAM Pumas , and possibly Mexican skinheads.

The fight ranged from Metro Insurgentes to la Angel, which is the de facto “gay ghetto”. It’s not unusual to see young kids from the suburbs or the campo just hanging … well… “out.”

In Queretero, there was a well-organized (via email and text-messaging) attack on los emos at the Plaza des Armes on 7 March. Some comments to an even-handed report on the Mexican blog, “Un trabajo sucio” (dealing mostly with pop culture and music) justify the anti-emo attacks on the grounds that the emos are “maricones”. Of course, comments on blogs do not always reflect general opinion, or even reflect the beliefs of the blogger.

On the other hand, Diario de Querataro describes the attackers as “Fresas” (literally “strawberries,” but figuratively “upper class twits”) — which suggests some kind of “class stuggle”. I don’t know enough about Mexican youth culture to make a guess one way or the other, but have noticed that the anti-emo spokeskids seem to speak and dress more like “juniors” than the “naco” emos. (A humorous take on naco and fresa fashion sensibilities — and language — is here).

Televisa, local newspapers and Sergay have different estimates, ranging from a few hundred to a thousand youths involved. There were also rumbles in Durango and Cuidad Guzman (Jalisco) on 15 March (the day of the Mexico City attack) and at least one anti-emo organizer in Sinoloa who puts out a “hotmail” address for more those interested in joining the anti-emos.

I also found a reference to an attack on emos at a blog called “Moviemento Anti Emosexual Inc.” to an emo-punketo confrontation at an Iron Maiden concert in Monterrey. Noticias de Oaxaca reports rumors of an planned anti-emo action for this coming Saturday (22 March)

From what I can tell, Moviemento Anti Emosexual, Inc.” is the main propaganda organ for the anti-emo crowd (this is a “high tech lynching” — or, rather lynch-mob. This talking head doesn’t shy away from using the term:

That website — laced as it is with obscenity and slang far beyond my ability to translate (HELP!) — suggests the anti-emos are motivated as much by more than homophobia:

[My first attempts at translating suggest the anti-emos justify their attacks on the grounds that the emos are not politically motivated -- do not protest the rise in DF bus fares, or the Colombian rocket attack on Ecuador, which killed several Mexican students... and that the emos are "gay". Suggestions given by the site range from the merely cruel -- "throw gum in their hair" and "send spam to their blogs and "myspace" pages -- to the violent.]

How Kristoff, the Russian born Polish punk rock DJ on Mexican TV fits into this, I don’t know. On the one hand, he attacks the emos for being “gay” and on the other, the punks for being anti-free expression. In the first video, he makes light of the “gay” stereotype, but in the second, he condemns the attacks in no uncertain terms:

Whether the anti-emos are part of a “vast right-wing conspiracy” I can’t say. But there are politicians on the right who seem to be in sympathy with the anti-emos. PAN politician Gerardo Hernández Gutiérrez, the Alcade (Mayor) of Celeya, is calling for the emos to be “relocated” from his city’s downtown… because they might give the city a bad image.

By contrast, in the PRD-run Federal District, jefe de Gobierno Marcelo Ebrard, ordered the police to protect the emos. Police commissioner (Secretary of Public Security) Joel Ortega was quoted as saying this was a civil rights matter.

Class and gender-roles seem to figure more in this than hair or musical style. Beyond that, I’ll need more information.

Categories: Celaya · Ciudad de México · Crime and Punishment · Durango · Fresas · Gays · Guanajuato · Human Rights · Jalisco · La Raza (Mexican cultures and peoples) · Media · Monterrey · Music · Nacos · Nuevo Leon · Oaxaca · PAN · Policia · Politica (Mexicana) · Provincia · Queretaro · Teenagers · Tribus urban · Zona Rosa