Skip to content

Don’t cry for me, PEMEX

9 April 2008

I haven’t had the time to digest the latest proposal from the Calderón Administration, but with each new version of  an “energy reform” bill, it is less and less likely that the eventual reforms will de-nationalize the “paraestatal

I am using the Mexican term for PEMEX — paraestatal — because I can’t think of a word in English that describes PEMEX:  a profit making government enterprise.  It’s an oil company AND a federal cabinet agency AND has social, political and economic responsibilities outside the normal purview of either a business or a bureaucracy.

If you look at PEMEX solely as an oil company, then it is perfectly logical for it to seek foreign partners.  An oil company would presumably want to increase their access to supply (deep water drilling) and seek the capital to do so, even if it meant sharing the profits.  BUT… that’s assuming oil companies need to grow.

It was recently announced that PEMEX had gone from 7th to 10th place among the oil giants.  SO?  That only matters if you’re talking about continued high exports, and not about PEMEX’s other role — providing MEXICO with cheap oil.  Even with falling reserves, Mexico has plenty of oil for its own needs.  WIth fiscal reforms designed to lessen the state’s dependency on oil revenues, exports should be less important.  It’s not Mexico’s oil consumers who need to worry… it’s the U.S. that depends on Mexican oil, and has the largest stake in continued exploration (and exploitation) of Mexican fields.

The “legitimate government” (the friends of AMLO) has been leaking documents from PEMEX (and AMLO still has strong ties to the paraestatal from his days as an oil workers’ union leader) has been leaking documents that suggest the “de facto government’s” real interest is in providing a way for the Spanish oil giant, REPSOL.  Pemex owns a 4.5% stake in Repsol, but it appears proposals to open PEMEX to foreign investments have mostly been crafted to benefit Repsol.

Within congress, the leftist coalition, FAP, and much of PRI has opposed privatization, as has the Catholic Church.  From what I can tell, the latest Administration bill seeks to mollify at least enough PRI senators and deputies to give the bill a chance.  It would allow third-party contracts for some services, including refining and pipelines (which would remain the property of the third party… and has already been rejected by FAP) would have to maintain a “Mexican personality.”  If this bill passes, at worst, the investors are going to be Mexican companies (in theory anyway) and — even if Mexican oil exports drop — it’s not going to mean a return to the “bad old days” of foreign control.  In the “new world order” they already do that through the banks, right?

2 Comments leave one →
  1. Mr. Rushing's avatar
    Mr. Rushing permalink
    9 April 2008 3:27 pm

    I do not feel bad for US oil prices. The US has depended on foriegn oil for far too long. The Socialists (Anti-Free Trade Democrats) in America have blocked any type of drilling in or slightly outside the US. (Like the Gulf Of Mexico) The Left has also managed to convince enough people that global warming can only be caused by man and that it is government’s job to try and stop it. Hopefully, people will wake up and elect officials that will vote on measures to increase domestic petroleum in the US.

  2. Steve Gallagher's avatar
    9 April 2008 4:13 pm

    As I have said before, Pemex has been, and can still be, Mexico’s Cash Cow. Oil will only be worth more and more money in the future. It can support many programs in support of the Mexican citizens, especially for the poor. Pemex reserves have been going down, but one of the main reasons for this has been the purposeful lack of re-investment in exploration.

    I believe that the government has underfunded Pemex investments in order to make the company look bad, in order to help gain acceptance for the idea of privatizing or partially privatizing Pemex. This would be the ultimate opportunity for corruption, and screw-over of the Mexican people.

    While in Mexico last week, I was told by an older man from Michoacan the origin of the word Gringo. He belives that it comes from the 1938 start-up of Pemex, with the throwing out of the foreign oil companies. Most foreign oil company oil workers at that time wore green uniforms. As part of the push towards getting them to leave, Mexican used the slogan ” Green Go”, or “People in green uniforms, Please leave”. I don’t know if there is any truth to this, but it makes a good story.

    Steve Gallagher

Leave a reply to Mr. Rushing Cancel reply