Skip to content

They dream a little DREAM

5 April 2009

The DREAM (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minor) Act (H.R. 1751, S. 729) would

… provide undocumented immigrant youth in the United States with conditional residency and a pathway to citizenship provided they came here before the age of 16 and maintained continuous residence for 5 years, graduate from high school or obtain a GED, attend 2 years of college or join the military and have no criminal records.

You expect opposition from the  “what part of illegal didn’t they understand” crowd (what part of “minor child” do the nativists not understand?), but it is immigrant rights advocates who are the loudest opponents of the proposed legislation.

Kyle de Beausset (Citizen Orange) sees two main objections from these opponents:

One argument that migrant advocates will make against the DREAM Act is not that it shouldn’t be passed, but that it shouldn’t be passed now.  Influential migrant advocacy organizations and politicians will argue that the DREAM Act should be passed as part of “comprehensive immigration reform” (CIR), whatever that means.

The second argument migrant advocates will advance against the DREAM Act is that it should be opposed because of the military provision of the DREAM Act.  I actually am much more sympathetic to this argument than the previous one.  I hate the military provision of the DREAM Act and I know many unauthorized migrant youth that hate it, too… The DREAM Act, in it’s present form, only has two routes for unauthorized migrant youth to secure legal status, and eventually citizenship, either through college, or through the military. As unauthorized migrant youth are generally underprivileged, it’s easy to see how most would have to serve in the military to get legal status.

“Manuel”, the pseudonym used by the author of “I Am A Shadow” is one of those DREAMers, has little patience with both those taking an “all or nothing” approach and with those who would kill the bill because of the military option:

In the war of immigration, the Dream Act to be exact, people like myself not only have to fight against the nativist who hate us, but also against people who you would expect be on our side. But no, they aren’t. Why? Because of the fact the Dream Act also makes people like myself elegible to join the army. America is embroiled in two unpopular fronts on regards to war, Iraq and Afganistan, and I can understand why you can say that the Dream Act is wrong in the regards to the military. My answer for that …

Opposing an educational opportunity such as the DREAM Act is precisely what creates conditions for military recruitment. Undocumented students are joining the military right now, putting themselves at risk of death and deportation, just to get legalized since going to college does not give them that option…

Right now, the death and deportation of thousands of undocumented youth fall directly on the heads of those that oppose the DREAM Act…

Get a life and start doing some real advocacy for migrant rights.

10 Comments leave one →
  1. Dan Herzer's avatar
    Dan Herzer permalink
    5 April 2009 10:39 am

    Good blurb Rich. This issue gets little attention in the main stream media. It isn’t sexy, pictures of Oxxo styrofoam coolers containing severed heads get much better ratings. It also makes it difficult for those who feel they have the moral high ground (they are illegals after all) to maintain that position as this issue pertains to children who almost always had no choice in the matter of where their parents chose to reside.

    It would be nice if service to the USA was more broadly defined then simply military service, but that isn’t as large of a problem as it is portrayed. These children are often very good students despite being “underpriviledged.” Structuring the program so that the “stick” portion is something of benefit for these kids in the long run is not a bad thing (provided, of course, that they don’t get “Charlie Browned.”)

  2. Esther's avatar
    6 April 2009 7:38 am

    I may be wrong, but it seems to me that amost of the lthe immigration activists in the states assume that all immigrants want to stay and become citizens. Some do, but many don’t. In any event, these bills often are deaf to the needs of families to be families. Essentially, this law may breed a bunch of illegal border crossings so that kids can visit grandparents and even parents who have stayed at home. It certainly treats them as delinquents on probation. It doesn’t acknowledge that they may have trouble coming up with the money to go to college or even to stay in high school if they are living with people in the shadows who move from job to job. And indeed, many of these kids are good students and certainly a lot better behaved than their US citizen counterparts.

    I have seen and could probably dredge up the statistics that show that US education in fact is in itself harmful to the very family ties that keep these kids on track.

  3. Dan Herzer's avatar
    Dan Herzer permalink
    6 April 2009 10:16 am

    When it comes to this particular group, it is a safe assumption that the vast majority of them would like to stay and become US citizens. It is not unusual for these kids to have little remembrance of life before emmigating. Although it is true that this is not a panacea for all the ills of the current situation, it would at least rectify one of the more egregious problems ie. that kids raised in the US and encouraged to seek higher education are shipped out of the country when they try and do exactly what they have been taught to believe is proper.

    The educational system in the US is certainly not without deficiencies, but be a bit careful about the harms family values statements. Often what is being objected to is that it teaches girls to be a bit too indepenent, even encourages birth control (Oh, My!)

  4. Esther's avatar
    6 April 2009 1:24 pm

    I guess the thing that most bothers me is the lack of resources kids have for meeting the demands unless they join the military. Kind of a nasty way to build an army. Further, the inability for such kids to go home to Mexico to visit sometimes is definitely not good for the kids or the families.

    I think Americans way overvalue the American way of life and don’t understand the ties of home here in Mexico. I imagine most kids who have spent most of their lives in the US think of it as home, so naturally they want to stay. However, many, many value trips to Mexico.

    Kids are dazzled by the new cars in the states, etc., but as I hope Americans are now learning, the glitz does not a worthwhile life make. In our years in San Antonio, many Mexicans and Mexican Americans of all ages who could afford to liked living comfortably, yes, but thought that “Anglos” had a lot to learn from them about values. Here where we live, it is the same. Interestingly, a lot of Mexican Americans in San Antonio for generations have managed to climb out of poverty through the US Military.

    You’re wrong on sex ed. It is compulsory here in Mexico. And it is real sex-ed, not abstinence only. My young neighbor and recently discussed the fact that some girls still got pregnant and for some similar reasons as in the US. You might also like to know that way up in the mountains in tiny communities drawings of birth control methods decorate the outside walls of local community health clinics. Mexico is a birth control success in most places. The birth rate has fallen from 7 kids per woman to just slightly over 2 since the 1970s. The pope may wail about this as may the church hierarchy, but they don’t have much influence. In Mexico, many churches are rather sparsely populated on Sundays. Even where they are populated, the priests are often pro-birth control. Remember, it was a priest who started the Mexican Revolution in 1810. And people here know priests on the whole are not saints.

    Mexican girls are better students and make up more of UNAM’s graduating class than do boys. In our neighborhood in Mexico, girls are not servile. In fact, property ownership often passes through the woman and a lot of women do not take their husbands’ names. There are many, many women physicians in Xalapa, the capital of the state of Veracruz, and men and women alike go to them. A rather interesting woman is in charge of the PRI, perhaps again the biggest political party. There is one in our colonia who serves the population at large. The former US ambassador married a very successful Mexican businesswoman. She is if I remember correctly the second richest woman in Latin America. Women of all social levels hold all kinds of jobs. Men need them to work here, as they do in the US. I would be careful making overgeneralizations about the girls and women in Mexico or in Mexican families.

    Mexican youths get in the same kinds of trouble here that they do in the states, and as they do all over the world now that social ties have been broken by the need to migrate internally or externally for work; now that not enough jobs exist; now that good education is elusive world-wide; now that mafia-like organizations can offer them either death or lots of money, as they say. It is the tragedy of corporate dominance of globalization. (Not that every kid would have been a good kid if it weren’t for globalization. Mexico has produced all kinds of crooks and criminals through the years.)

    I think citizenship means for kids the chance to work legally, the chance,supposedly, not to be afraid of immigration authorities, the chance to take part in the ever-shrinking pool of worker benefits. And of course the chance to feel safe at home in the US. But at least in San Antonio, family still matters to people from all generations if the family can stay close. There are studies that show that it is good, for instance, for kids to know Spanish as well as English, that kids who don’t know Spanish have more trouble both with their families and in the world away from home in the US. I think you can find some of this at the Brookings Institution. Don’t undervalue Mexican values. The US could use more of them.

  5. richmx2's avatar
    6 April 2009 2:20 pm

    Dan, on the birth control issue… Mexico is the model for delivery birth control information around the world (and, if you read the Mexican Constitution, family planning is a right).

    Schools — even the Catholic ones — are required to teach the national curriculum, which includes birth control. A friend of mine, a single mom, has a son whose a bit of a handful (I called him “El Bart Simpson”) who was being sent to a very, very strict Catholic school. I had to take the kid over to Farmacias Similares to buy condoms for his “show and tell” project for his birth control class. The kid was 11. THAT would not happen in a U.S. school, even a so-called “liberal” one.

  6. Dan Herzer's avatar
    Dan Herzer permalink
    6 April 2009 2:26 pm

    Esther, I think you missed the point. When I stated that it is important to be careful in citing statistics on how the US education system is bad for family values, I was referring to your statement that US education is bad for families. It is indeed the fact that much of the research done in this area, on the US educational system, has been funded by the extreme religious right wing in order to promote their agenda and that agenda is not particularly receptive to independence for women. I made no statement and implied nothing about the system in Mexico.

    As far as the fact that

  7. Dan Herzer's avatar
    Dan Herzer permalink
    6 April 2009 2:31 pm

    Esther, I think you missed the point. When I stated that it is important to be careful in citing statistics on how the US education system is bad for family values, I was referring to your statement that US education is bad for families. It is indeed the fact that much of the research done in this area, on the US educational system, has been funded by the extreme religious right wing in order to promote their agenda and that agenda is not particularly receptive to independence for women. I made no statement and implied nothing about the system in Mexico.
    I am sure that all you stated about system in Mexico is true, just not germane to this discussion.

    As far as the discussions you relate stating that girls get pregnant in Mexico and in the US for similar reasons, I would assume so. Not even Lou Dobbs would question that biological fact.

  8. Esther's avatar
    6 April 2009 5:30 pm

    I’m no conservative, but I do have to say I think US education is bad for families and for communities and for social ties….much of it, anyway. At present, it stresses testing over all; acquisition of basic skills and rote-learned material over the richness of literature or history or our own or other cultures; kids are often bored to tears or mainly competing to get into a college. I know I’m overgeneralizing. Poor kids go to school because they have to and they learn very little in them, not even enough to get good jobs. I am glad Obama seems to have a much broader vision for education. I hope he gets somewhere.

    In Mexico, which again, is not anything close to heaven in anyway (some Americans’ views to the contrary) at least they stress community values; they have courses that address environmental issues which include addressing them as of community concern; they stress the value of academic success for the purposes of serving family and community, etc. Now truth be told, a lot of schools are basically having kids thumb through the book and watch tv until the end of the term. But that’s not so different, is it, from the US? At least there is a recognition that there’s more to life than self. AND I might add that if you did a poll here in my colonia about whether people thought global warming was real or whether deforestation was a significant issue, most people would say yes to both questions. Even though, on the other hand, deforestation continues and Mexican cities belch out CO2 and for that matter, industrial agriculture gallops ahead.
    However, just to inform you, Mexico City has banned plastic bags and has cleared the air considerably and the Xalapa Diario has had significant environmental activities and you can see awareness in students again in rural schools where their posters hang in windows. And on non-environmental issues, abortion and civil unions for gays are legal and the State Theater here in Xalapa is dedicated to a famous gay Mexican playwright who was.definitely out of the closet.

    On the pregnancy stuff: they’re not getting pregnant because of ignorance or abstinence only programs. I really don’t know the rates, but considering the birth rate, it can’t be that many at all.

  9. Esther's avatar
    6 April 2009 5:33 pm

    I have no sympathy for the religious right. I come to my position if anything from a democratic socialist perspective. I don’t think in the US at the moment education is actually doing that much for women, though I wish it were.

  10. kyledeb's avatar
    14 April 2009 12:55 am

    Hey Rich,

    I just saw this post and wanted to thank you for linking to me. I hope the DREAM Act is passed sooner rather than later. I hope Obama doesn’t sell migrants out.

Leave a reply to Dan Herzer Cancel reply