Don’t ask Felipe Calderón and don’t tell the Supreme Court
In Tokyo for mettings, Felipe Calderón was asked about the claims that his Administration’s legal challenge to the Federal District’s new gender-neutral marriage law was politically motivated.
Of course, it’s hard to say it isn’t, but Calderón gave it his best shot, claiming it was simply a matter of defending the Constitution, which — he says — specifically defines marriage as being between a man and a woman.
Is there a secret article in the Constitucíon Politíca de los Estados Unidos de Mexicos that I missed? I admit, I only looked for the words “mujer”, “hombre” , “boda” and “matrimonio” but the only mention I can find of marriage in the constitution is in Art. 30, Section B-II, which allows the state to regulate the naturalization of foreign residents, male OR female who marry a male OR female Mexican citizen.
Either the Prez is trying to get everyone to study their constitution or he’s full of FeCal matter.
mexfiles.net 
Trackbacks